Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Escoville
Liberation 1944 #9
(Defender) Germany vs Britain (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Britain 2nd Oxfordshire & Buckinghamshire Light Infantry
Germany 21st Panzer Reconnaissance Battalion
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for LIBE009
Total
Side 1 2
Draw 0
Side 2 5
Overall Rating, 7 votes
5
4
3
2
1
3.43
Scenario Rank: 448 of 913
Parent Game Liberation 1944
Historicity Historical
Date 1944-06-07
Start Time 09:00
Turn Count 12
Visibility Day
Counters 56
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 1
Maps 1: 58
Layout Dimensions 43 x 28 cm
17 x 11 in
Play Bounty 137
AAR Bounty 165
Total Plays 7
Total AARs 2
Battle Types
Inflict Enemy Casualties
Urban Assault
Conditions
Hidden Units
Off-board Artillery
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Smoke
Terrain Mods
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Liberation 1944 Base Game
Introduction

On D-Day the Ox and Bucks landed among the first wave of British troops and promptly secured their objectives in a daring coup de main with few casualties. A day later their objective, the town of Escoville, lay ahead guarded by the thinly spread 21st Panzer Division.

Conclusion

While the 21st Panzer Division was a mediocre outfit, the recon battalion was a cut above the rest of the formation. In heavy fighting the British managed to take Escoville but a counterattack soon drove them back out. The day’s fighting cost the Ox and Bucks battalion 80 casualties plus their commander. Already suffering from wounds incurred on D-Day, he died after extracting his men from Escoville that evening.


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Open-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables, but DO take step losses from X and #X results (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT). If a "2X" or "3X" result is rolled, at least one of the step losses must be taken by an open-top AFV if present.
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable
  • APC – Armored Personnel Carrier: These are Combat Units, but stack like Transports. They can transport personnel units or towed units. They are not counted as combat units for the +1 stacking modifier on the Direct Fire and Bombardment Tables (4.4). They may be activated by regular leaders and tank leaders (1.2, 3.34, 4.3, 5.43). They do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).
  • Armored Cars: These are Combat Units. They are motorized instead of mechanized. All have their own armored car leaders, who can only activate armored cars (6.85). Do not provide the +1 Assault bonus (ACC).
  • Reconnaissance Vehicle: 8.23 Special Spotting Powers Both foot and vehicle mounted recce units (1.2) possess two special spotting abilities. The first ability is that they can spot enemy in limiting terrain at one hex further than the TEC specifies for other units and leaders. For example, an enemy unit in town can normally be spotted at three hexes or less, but a recce unit can spot them at four hexes.Their second ability is that they can place a Spotted marker on any one enemy unit they can spot per turn, just as if the enemy unit had "blown its cover" by firing. Such Spotted markers are removed as described earlier.
  • Unarmored Weapon Carriers: These are unarmored halftracks (Bufla and Sk7/2) or fully-tracked vehicles (Karl siege mortar) with mounted weapons. All are mechanized, except the BM-13 (Katyusha rocket launcher mounted on a truck). They are weapon units, not AFV's, so they are never efficient and cannot be activated by tank leaders. (SB)

Display Order of Battle

Britain Order of Battle
Army
  • Mechanized
  • Towed
Germany Order of Battle
Heer
  • Motorized

Display Errata (6)

6 Errata Items
Scen 9

The scenario calls for 5 Bren, there are only 3 on the counter sheet. I used M3s as a substitute for the other 2.

(J6A on 2017 Sep 28)
Overall balance chart for 869

All Bren carriers should have a movement value of 7.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 20

The reduced direct fire value of the Heer HMG became 5-5 starting with Fall of France.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 63

The morale and combat modifiers of German Sergeant #1614 should be "0", not "8".

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 543

The SK 7/2 appearing in 1940: Fall of France is actually a SK 6/2, but misprinted by APL. Hence it should be unarmored in that game. The SK 7/2, which appears in other games is correctly printed with an armor of 0.

(plloyd1010 on 2022 Apr 28)
Overall balance chart for 47

All SPW 251s have an armor value of 0.

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)

Display AARs (2)

I could swear I left my artillery around here somewhere
Author J6A
Method Solo
Victor Britain
Play Date 2017-10-19
Language English
Scenario LIBE009

This is an interesting scenario. The Germans have a small, recon heavy force consisting mostly of GREN, APCs and several armored cars. They are opposed by the British who have a good sized force, mostly infantry althoug a bunch in Bren carriers (there weren't enough counters for them in the game, I substituted M3s), along with a couple of Tetrarch light tanks for support. Compared to the German armored cars, the British are outclassed in the armor department, and we're not talking Panthers vs. Centurions here. A small number of the German units get to set up hidden. To win, the Brits have to take both of the smaller towns on the board, or the large town (Escoville). They get a major victory if they get all 3 towns. The Germans have to prevent the British from fulfilling either objective, and also to kill 11 steps for a major victory.

I set up a solid combined arms defense in each of the small towns, leaving just the mortars for support in Escoville, and hiding units closer to Escoville. This may have hurt the Germans in the long run. The British entered and on the right side of the battlefield (German left) quickly unloaded HMGs from the Bren carriers. With a 1 leader, 3 HMGs and 3 Bren carriers in adjacent hexes get the Brits to 45 DF factors, and they put intense fire on the town. This made the infantry keep their heads down, and the armored cars were too scarce do to much to stop this. The Tetrarchs and 6 lb AT guns stayed off the board at the beginning, not wanting to get shredded by the armored cars. The eastern town was invested by infantry.

Things did not go great for the Germans. They fought hard and killed a lot of steps, and there were just too many British. Once the 6lb guns were finally deployed, they started picking off armored cars in assault hexes (after the armored cars had slaughtered the Bren carriers). The German OBA was non-existent. There was a 1/3 chance of getting 2x16 each turn, and I didn't get any until turn 7, and had it only 2x in the 11 turns I played. Eventually, sheer weight of numbers took down the Germans in the front towns, although the larger small town (3 hexes) didn't fall until turn 11. The British were putting pressure on Escoville, however there was no way they were going to take the entire town by the end of the scenario. It had just taken too long to clear the front towns.

As mentioned, casualties were high. The Germans had lost 14 steps, the British 15 when I called it. And that was without the Germans taking a big shot from Escoville at the infantry trying to take it (a reduced armored car, 2 APCs and an HMG platoon firing adjacent).

This was an interesting scenario with a lot of movement. While the British prevailed here with heavy casualties (which was the historic results), better luck with the German OBA and better placement of the hidden units could have easily changed the outcome. It's going to be a challenge for the Germans in any case, because they are seriously outnumbered. However, they do have strong units, and the armor advantage can cut down on the British firepower by taking the thin skinned British APCs out of the fight, while the British will have more trouble with the German halftracks. It was my 1st Liberation 1944 scenario, and a good intro to the module.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Liberation 1944: scenario #9: Escoville
Author JayTownsend
Method Solo
Victor Britain
Play Date 2021-12-20
Language English
Scenario LIBE009

Liberation 1944: scenario #9: Escoville

I really like the huge selection of vehicle/armor types in Liberation but I don’t care so much for the very dark maps but still it won’t keep me from playing good scenarios! In this scenario both sides start right up against each other, so the action starts immediately in this 12 turn scenario where the objective is mostly about controlling the towns, especially the larger one called Escoville. The Germans can also get some level of victory from eliminating British steps but that is conditional on the British controlling or not controlling the town hexes.

The Germans have mostly an Armored Recon of mostly armored cars and halftracks of various types and a company of Infantry to try and hold three towns while the British have three times the Infantry, support units & a couple of platoons of the light Tetrarch tanks.

In my game play, it was a bloody struggle for most of the game, with the Germans losing 13 steps and the British losing 17 steps and a leader but in the end the British numbers were too strong for the Germans to hold back. The British control Escoville and one other town but were in too bad of a shape to be able to take the third town, thus no major victory. The British achieved a Minor Victory in this one. Kind of a fun scenario to play.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.3 seconds.