Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
St. Laurent Again
Invasion 1944 #1
(Defender) Germany vs United States (Attacker)
Formations Involved
Germany 352nd Infantry Division
Germany 726th Infantry Regiment
United States 115th Infantry Regiment
United States 58th Armored Field Artillery Battalion
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for IN44001
Total
Side 1 6
Draw 4
Side 2 8
Overall Rating, 22 votes
5
4
3
2
1
3.41
Scenario Rank: 455 of 913
Parent Game Invasion 1944
Historicity Historical
Date 1944-06-06
Start Time 16:30
Turn Count 14
Visibility Day
Counters 37
Net Morale 1
Net Initiative 1
Maps 1: 106
Layout Dimensions 43 x 28 cm
17 x 11 in
Play Bounty 123
AAR Bounty 123
Total Plays 18
Total AARs 9
Battle Types
Inflict Enemy Casualties
Urban Assault
Entrenchment Control
Conditions
Entrenchments
Off-board Artillery
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Invasion 1944 Base Game
Introduction

In the afternoon, the American 115th Infantry Regiment had landed and the 29th Division staff assigned the 116th to advance on the western end of the lodgment and Vierville-sur-Mer. The 115th Infantry Regiment was given the task of securing St.-Laurent-sur-Mer. The 116th's attack had shown that the stone houses in St. Laurent could not be harmed by any weapons possessed by the infantry so a few stray tanks that had survived the hellish two-mile "float" into shore were rounded up to lend support. Even with their help things looked dicey so Captain Thomas Cadwaladar had been sent to round up more help.

Conclusion

Captain Cadwalader 's mission proved profitable as the firepower of the 58th Armored Field Artillery (the offboard artillery) destroyed the stone houses the Germans were using for cover one by one. When darkness forced the Americans to suspend operations they controlled all but a small enclave on the west side of the village. The use of high volumes of artillery fire to achieve tactical gains would become a hallmark of American attacks in 1944-45.

Additional Notes

Introductory scenario #1


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable

Display Order of Battle

Germany Order of Battle
Heer
  • Towed
United States Order of Battle
Army
  • Mechanized

Display Errata (2)

2 Errata Items
Overall balance chart for 20

The reduced direct fire value of the Heer HMG became 5-5 starting with Fall of France.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 54

The movement allowance on the counters in Airborne is misprinted. It should be "3."

(rerathbun on 2012 Jan 30)

Display AARs (9)

Back to School
Author sasmo12
Method Solo
Victor Draw
Play Date 2019-09-22
Language English
Scenario IN44001

This was my first game of PG. Made a lot of mistakes in both deployment, execution, and game play. The Americans came through the fields avoiding the openess of the roads. Germans overlooked all Opportunity Fire chances.

Americans had a slight advantage and had almost taken the stong point at 0908. However, time goal was not met.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Take St. Laurent and the Strongpoint, boys!
Author treadasaurusrex (United States)
Method VASSAL
Victor United States
Participants Col. Sonichu
Play Date 2022-08-14
Language English
Scenario IN44001

This was a 3-session introductory scenario with the intrepid & quick-thinking Col. Sonichu commanding a defending force of German Panzergrenadiers in-and-around the 2-hex town of St. Laurent. We used the optional smoke and excess initiative rules and dispensed with the defense-biased fog of war rule. I played the attacking Americans.

The first session (game turns 1-4) featured a green, American 29th Infantry Division combined arms Task Force moving-to-contact in the northwest quadrant of Map 106. The US movement was slightly jumbled as the approaching assault columns were hit by German opportunity and OBA fire on the west & north margins of St. Laurent, but by the end of turn 4, the Americans had a foothold in the western half of St. Laurent and the German garrison was decisively engaged thanks to a pair of successful American close assaults. During this session, both sides managed a combined total of NINE, combat 7-die rolls.

The second session (game turns 5-10) was characterized by very accurate German OBA and the liberation of both hexes of St. Laurent by the invading Americans. US forces continued closing in, and by the end of this session, they were in close assault on the hex immediately adjacent to strongpoint WN 67. The lower-morale American force suffered a long string of disruptions and demoralizations as they pursued the remaining German troops, which caused confusion and dislocation in the stacks as the attackers moved east. During this session, both sides managed a combined total of TEN combat 7-die rolls.

The third session (game turns 11-14 ) was notable in several ways: 1) neither side threw a combat 7-die roll; 2) the Americans continued to suffer many disruptions & demoralizations which caused attack sequencing to break down as in the previous session; 3) friendly Allied OBA caused havoc among US units when rounds went astray; 4) the Germans in the strongpoint were slowly surrounded and eventually driven out during turn 12; and 5) surprisingly there were no US casualties. By the end of turn 13, both St. Laurent and WN67 were occupied by exhausted American infantry platoons. This resulted in a hard-fought, Allied major victory. The final step losses for the Germans was 12.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Too Much or Too Little Bocage
Author PANISTA (United States)
Method VASSAL
Victor Draw
Participants treadasaurusrex
Play Date 2023-08-24
Language Català
Scenario IN44001

This was a fast-paced and frustrating, 5-session fight with the relentless Treadasaurus commanding the defending Germans with a seemingly endless series of advantages. I took the harder task as the attacking American commmander. We played with the FOW, consolidation, smoke and excess initiative optional rules. As others has said this is a good intro to Panzer Grenadier, though only the Germans drew good leaders. There were 3-FOW shortened turns in this battle. This factor seems to have helped the Germans in this draw.

Others have reported this better than I can with my limited English, so I will summarize. After heavy fighting both sides achieved one of their victory conditions for a drawn battle. The US side too the WN67 strongpoint but at a heavy cost thanks to the special AT fire rules for the German Grenadiers.

This was a fun and action-packed battle to play and I recommend this scenario for both solo and shared play.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Sold First Scenario for Invasion 1944
Author petermc
Method Solo
Victor United States
Play Date 2017-03-05
Language English
Scenario IN44001

My first crack at this game.

The German setup is pretty scripted; I did put an MG north of the trail to slow the US advance.

The US entered on the main trail, mostly, although a smaller group headed towards the town of St. Laurent. The bigger US group crossed the center hill and swarmed the victory location/entrenchment. Because of bocage, opportunity fire from the reduced MG unit there was ineffective.

Thus, the larger American force was able to assault the entrenchment. It took 6 turns worth of assaults, recovery, losing some demoralized units who fled, bringing in some new ones, etc., but finally the entrenchment was cleared.

That gave the US a minor victory; to match that the Germans would need to eliminate 3 steps, but the US only lost one step in the assault.

The base face-up morale (US=8, German=7) is the key to this scenario. The Germans will disrupt easily (the 716th VG infantry was not a top unit!), and the US will get a column shift in assaults for higher morale, usually.

Because the US lost time in the first assault, they weren't able to concentrate on St. Laurent quickly enough for the major win. They did assault both hexes and the game ended with both town hexes contested, the entrenchment gone, and the US never lost more than 1 step (the bocage actually helps the US here, in some ways). With 1-2 more turns this would have been a major US win, still, the minor win was pretty easily accomplished. I'm not sure how the Germans can defend against this approach any better.

As a narrative, a simulation, and a display of this early struggle for the Omaha beach sector, this is a fine scenario, worthy of a "4" rating. However as a competitive scenario I ranked it only a "3", because the German setup and response ability is so limited, playing the German side isn't as much fun. You'll probably only move a few times and mostly you are opportunity firing and recovering.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Scenario Intro-one
Author Warhawk1955 (United States)
Method Face to Face
Victor Draw
Participants Dan_Huffman
Play Date 2017-07-05
Language English
Scenario IN44001

After playing many of the games in Invasion 44 going back to the intro scenario’s was actually hard. Getting use to the Bocage rules and then playing without it was hard. After using the +2 bocage as cover and using the limited terrain rules not having this caused units to get shot up several times. But if this is the first scenario that is played in is a good intro to Panzer Grenadier. We called this a draw because each side achieved one of their victory conditions. Each of us had one of our objectives. The American needs to conserve his force in order to take St. Laurent. This is more important if the Germans have placed a token force to protect hex WN67. That is what my opponent did in this case. Having to take both objectives I sent my tank 3 infantry and 1 HMG to take hex WN67 under command of 2 LT’s. During the officer selection I pulled and average selection with the stats evenly divided with only 1 1:1 leader. Most were 1:0 0:1 or 0:0. Taking the hex was costly but achieved with only 2 step loses but I loss the tank to a great roll by a squad using the German Anti-tank fire. All in all if I had played this first I would have approached the town and WN67 with more caution.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Assault and assault and assault and no effect.
Author Blackcloud6
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2018-11-30
Language English
Scenario IN44001

A straightforward scenario, move and take two objectives. I sent two American infantry companies plus the tanks to take St. Laurent and one company to take WN67. The Americas were able to take the west hex of DST. Laurent but could not oust the defenders ion the next hex after turns of assaults. They company going after WN67 fared worse as the Germans set up a platoon with a leader on the nearby hill and hammered the Americans with direct and indirect fire. The tanks came over to assist and finally a combined arms assault wen t in but could not oust the Germans. The Germans killed seven American steps and got the decisive victory.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
St. Laurent-Again?
Author mikejames38
Method Solo
Victor United States
Play Date 2022-05-05
Language English
Scenario IN44001

Played the intro scenario "St. Laurent Again" playing both sides. The Americans approached the town through the hedgerows, forming up for assaults on an entrenched machine gun position as well as St. Laurent itself. A foolhardy early assault on the entrenched position by a platoon of Sherman tanks was repulsed with significant losses, and the German defenders called in artillery on US infantry units forming up for assaults and also subjected them to withering defensive fire leaving the US forces stalled in disrupted or demoralized status. Attempts to rally the troops were met by more fire and more demoralized and disrupted units. As dusk approached, the Germans moved infantry units from a hill overlooking a crossroads to the entrenched position and onward to reinforce the units defending the town but leaving only one reduced HMG platoon in the entrenchment. As US units rallied, an artillery barrage followed by an assault by tanks and infantry destroyed the defending unit bringing a minor victory within the American's grasp. The Germans quickly formed an assault group to take back the position and moved from the town alongside the entrenched enemy to ready for the assault. The Americans countered with an artillery barrage and direct fire attack that wiped out two of the German infantry platoons. With the assault group reduced by 2/3rds, the German leadership pulled the remaining infantry platoon back to St. Laurent to ensure that the town was still in German hands by nightfall. The result was a minor US victory, with the German left no option but to retreat with what few troops remained after the assault.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Introductory? Wow!
Author Grognard Gunny
Method Solo
Victor United States
Play Date 2023-01-25
Language English
Scenario IN44001

This proved to be an interesting scenario. Despite the number of American forces, it was a close run battle. (I STILL think there should be a +1 movement penalty for foot units crossing hedgerow (bocage) hex sides.)

2 Comments
2023-01-26 13:05

Its kind of a meme at this point how every game APL has stamped "Introductory" on has featured hedgerows which are just about the most tedious, complex, and non representative terrain in the system.

That being said, the earlier hedgerow rules were more restrictive to infantry.

2023-01-27 20:07

As I was admonished (and embarressed) to find that I had been remiss in NOT seeing (or reading) the "Advanced Rules" located in between the "basic scenarios" and all that followed the advanced rule section....... Mea culpa!

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
First ever PG play
Author Gikakan
Method Solo
Victor Draw
Play Date 2023-11-28
Language English
Scenario IN44001

My first ever PG scenario, played in 3 sessions. Probably, with huge amount of errors. Americans lost their Sherman’s pretty early. Fight for Strong Point WN67 was unbelievable long, and it was taken by US only on turn 10 or so. There was not enough time to take the town. I believe it’s a draw, because US take one of their objectives, and Germans inflict heavy losses to their opponents, so both sides can claim a minor victory. Overall I think it’s better to play this scenario solo - Germans don’t have much to do except opportunity fire. And I’m already hate this Normandy bocages! It’s hell!

2 Comments
2023-11-29 08:56

Not to be overly pushy, but still a little, have you thought about playing online? Shared play is the best way to learn this game, or any other game. PG Űber was created for just that reason. There are specific game packages covering nearly all the series. Here is the link to the Invasion '44 package. To play you will need to get the Base Module and a the Vassal engine. Picking up the minefield extension and read the documentation is helpful too.

Aside from all that, welcome the hedgerow hell!

Comment from Gikakan removed by author.
2023-12-01 04:23

Hi, thanks. I will definitely check this module!

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 0.893 seconds.