Panzer Grenadier Battles on April 27th:
Arctic Front Deluxe #40 - Children's Crusade Broken Axis #14 - Târgu Frumos: The Second Battle Scenario 3: Sledge Hammer of the Proletariat
Army Group South Ukraine #6 - Consternation Road to Berlin #73 - She-Wolves of the SS
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Red Dusk
Fall of France 1 #21
(Attacker) Germany vs France (Attacker)
Formations Involved
France 1re Division Marocaine
Germany 12th Infantry Regiment
Germany 33rd Motorized Infantry Regiment
Germany 35th Panzer Regiment
Germany 6th Panzer Regiment
Display
Balance:



Overall balance chart for FaoF021
Total
Side 1 10
Draw 0
Side 2 3
Overall Rating, 14 votes
5
4
3
2
1
3.07
Scenario Rank: 692 of 913
Parent Game Fall of France 1
Historicity Historical
Date 1940-05-15
Start Time 16:30
Turn Count 16
Visibility Day
Counters 103
Net Morale 0
Net Initiative 2
Maps 1: 32
Layout Dimensions 43 x 28 cm
17 x 11 in
Play Bounty 106
AAR Bounty 135
Total Plays 13
Total AARs 7
Battle Types
Urban Assault
Conditions
Off-board Artillery
Randomly-drawn Aircraft
Reinforcements
Terrain Mods
Scenario Requirements & Playability
Fall of France 1 Base Game
Introduction

The German assault on Gembloux itself had gotten nowhere. Rebuffed by rock-solid Moroccan infantry backed by extremely accurate French artillery, the German infantry paid a heavy price. The one bright spot for them was a point between Ernage and Gembloux where they had been able to punch a hole through the railway line and overrun the hidden antitank guns there. Then word came around midday that 3rd Panzer Division had pierced the line at Perbais and Ernage, and that brought on a new German attack with air support. The French began to give way around the Lagasse farm just north of Gembloux, but then the armored counterattack that had been ordered at 11:30 finally began.

Conclusion

The Germans poured heavy fire into the French whose infantry became separated from their tanks. Some of the latter were disabled by German AT fire or pinned down by German tanks arriving from Ernage to the north. By 1830 the counterattack had ground to a halt, but the Germans had been stopped and ended up withdrawing behind the railway. Unfortunately, as darkness fell on the battlefield the French success at Gembloux was voided by German victory farther south.

Additional Notes

This scenario may retro fitted with the Moroccan Division counterset.

This one of the scenarios shows the Moroccan Division at the peak of its fighting prowess, as such Dr. Bennighof suggests using ESC to replace INF used to represent Moroccan infantry. (Special note: Marocain HMG units have a Movement factor of 2.)


Display Relevant AFV Rules

AFV Rules Pertaining to this Scenario's Order of Battle
  • Vulnerable to results on the Assault Combat Chart (7.25, 7.63, ACC), and may be attacked by Anti-Tank fire (11.2, DFT). Anti-Tank fire only affects the individual unit fired upon (7.62, 11.0).
  • AFV's are activated by tank leaders (3.2, 3.3, 5.42, 6.8). They may also be activated as part of an initial activating stack, but if activated in this way would need a tank leader in order to carry out combat movement.
  • AFV's do not block Direct Fire (10.1).
  • Full-strength AFV's with "armor efficiency" may make two anti-tank (AT) fire attacks per turn (either in their action segment or during opportunity fire) if they have AT fire values of 0 or more (11.2).
  • Each unit with an AT fire value of 2 or more may fire at targets at a distance of between 100% and 150% of its printed AT range. It does so at half its AT fire value. (11.3)
  • Efficient and non-efficient AFV's may conduct two opportunity fires per turn if using direct fire (7.44, 7.64). Units with both Direct and AT Fire values may use either type of fire in the same turn as their opportunity fire, but not both (7.22, 13.0). Units which can take opportunity fire twice per turn do not have to target the same unit both times (13.0).
  • Demoralized AFV's are not required to flee from units that do not have AT fire values (14.3).
  • Place a Wreck marker when an AFV is eliminated in a bridge or town hex (16.3).
  • AFV's do not benefit from Entrenchments (16.42).
  • AFV's may Dig In (16.2).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Immune to M, M1 and M2 results on Direct and Bombardment Fire Tables. Do not take step losses from Direct or Bombardment Fire. If X or #X result on Fire Table, make M morale check instead (7.25, 7.41, 7.61, BT, DFT).
  • Closed-top AFV's: Provide the +1 modifier on the Assault Table when combined with infantry. (Modifier only applies to Germans in all scenarios; Soviet Guards in scenarios taking place after 1942; Polish, US and Commonwealth in scenarios taking place after 1943.) (ACC)
  • Tank: all are closed-top and provide the +1 Assault bonus, when applicable

Display Order of Battle

France Order of Battle
Armée de Terre
  • Mechanized
Germany Order of Battle
Heer
  • Mechanized

Display Errata (3)

3 Errata Items
Overall balance chart for 20

The reduced direct fire value of the Heer HMG became 5-5 starting with Fall of France.

(plloyd1010 on 2015 Jul 31)
Overall balance chart for 63

The morale and combat modifiers of German Sergeant #1614 should be "0", not "8".

(Shad on 2010 Dec 15)
Overall balance chart for 54

The movement allowance on the counters in Airborne is misprinted. It should be "3."

(rerathbun on 2012 Jan 30)

Display AARs (7)

Beware of the Woods
Author Greg SW
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2011-02-25
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

To start of with, I chose to go with the spirit of the victory conditions rather than the letter. The Germans could easily win this if they just held up east of the railroad until the last one or two turns of the scenario, then rush across the railroad. All the Germans have to do to win is have an undemoralized unit on the west side of the railroad at the end of the game. However that would make for a boring game. This game was interesting in that to offset the French armor advantage the Germans sought to engage in close action and to get a stronghold in the cities, where they could defend well against counterattacks. This resulted in some close actions in the woods in order to get to the cities. Both sides, depending on how the close action was going, would bring down artillery on these hexes in an attempt to break the deadlock. Since the odds were the "friendly fire" column would be lower than the column applied to the opponent this actually made a huge difference. In the end this was better for the Germans as their artillery was less likely to hit adjacent hexes occupied by friendly troops.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Gallo sin espolón
Author enrique
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2012-07-17
Language Español
Scenario FaoF021

En este escenario una poderosa fuerza francesa, integrada por dos batallones de infantería y dos compañías de tanques R 35, apoyados por secciones de morteros y artillería fuera del tablero, AT y antiaérea, atacan las posiciones alemanas defendidas por un batallón de infantería y algunas unidades auxiliares.

Los franceses deben expulsar a las unidades alemanas situadas al oeste de la línea de ferrocarril y impedir que las que se encuentran al este de dicha línea la crucen. La batalla se entabla principalmente sobre el hex de ciudad 510, donde los alemanes han creado su principal punto de apoyo al oeste de la línea férrea. Los franceses concentran sobre este punto toda su artillería, morteros y el fuego de sus unidades de infantería, pero los alemanes se defienden espléndidamente y aunque sufren bajas consiguen mantenerse en el terreno hasta el final de la partida.

Al final del turno 12 los franceses se dan por vencidos y conceden la victoria al adversario.

Dos aspectos caracterizan esta partida: 1) La influencia decisiva de un líder alemán con modificador moral de "2" en el hex 510. 2) La incapacidad ofensiva de las unidades francesas, motivada por su escasa capacidad de fuego directo, de ahí el título de este AAR.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
We paid dearly for this ground, we're not giving it up easily!
Author J6A
Method Solo
Victor Germany
Play Date 2018-08-14
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

This scenario gave me a chance to play with my bright red Division Marocain units, who were tasked with taking back German gains north of Gembloux. Essentially, they had to push the Germans back to the rail line, having none in the town itself. As other AARs have mentioned, the victory conditions as written are virtually impossible to achieve, as it's too easy for the Germans to rush a few platoons into assaults late in the scenario and the French won't have time to eliminate them. In addition, I was playing with the 4-3 ESC, while the original scenario calls for 3-3 INF. Using the original units would make things much more difficult (i.e., 2 units are only 6 FP, the 4 column instead of 8 FP for the 7 column; 3 units in an assault with a 1 leader are 10 FP, for the 9 column as opposed to 13 FP for the 13 column).

The French have a good amount of OBA in this one, however the Germans have more. They also have tank support. The Germans have tanks, however they are mostly PzIs and PzIIs. The French did have a lot more infantry.

My plan for the Moroccans was to have the units in the main town of Gembloux mostly hold the line, hoping to pick off a few units because the Germans didn't have much in the way of depth. My main effort would be to force the units away from North Gembloux, where the terrain was more open, and back to the railway. As the Germans, my plan was basically to make the Moroccans pay dearly for every inch of ground they took.

This game is played on about 2/3 of a map, and is relatively static as the French push forward hex by hex. In the North, I was able to push the Germans back to the railroad at the cost of high casualties to both sides, except for 1 town that refused to fall. I did manage to get both units in the town demoralized, however only 1 of them routed out (and because the French had mostly bypassed the town, he routed deeper into Gembloux! To the south, the Germans tried an incursion into a weak part of the French line, sending a platoon of Panzer IIs and one of Infantry to a weakly held spot in the French defenses. The Panzers soon died at the hands of Moroccan AT guns, however I was unable to dislodge the infantry, and it repeatedly demoralize many of the troops assaulting it.

I called the game early on turn 15 of 16 as it became obvious that the Moroccans could not dislodge the Germans from the 3 town hexes they occupied. I had actually crossed the railroad in the south with a couple of HMG platoons and taken 2 town hexes there before they ran into armor that would have been a risky assault, however those hexes don't count in the scenario as published. Casualties were very high on both sides in all the close range fighting.

This is a hard scenario to recommend. It was nice to use my red counters, and they made it a balanced fight, however it wasn't an exciting fight. It was a WW1 type battle of attrition, and the Germans held on by the skin of their teeth. There wasn't much movement, and most of it was 1 hex a turn. So, while the situation is militarily interesting, it didn't make a great game.

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Nearly pulled off a French win
Author waynebaumber (France)
Method VASSAL
Victor Germany
Participants unknown
Play Date 2021-03-21
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

This scenario has the excellent French Moroccan troops counter attacking elements of the 3rd Panzer division near the sites of previous battles ( #17 & #18 of this series). Like the previous encounters this battle soon developed into a series of close assaults, with the German firepower, armour and excellent leadership eventually prevailed.

Good scenario and probably deserving of a higher score I sure Bangla will score it a 4 has he was the German commander in this one

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Les Miserables
Author treadasaurusrex (France)
Method VASSAL
Victor France
Participants Blackcloud6 (AAR)
Play Date 2021-12-29
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

Here is yet another unplaytested scenario with a number of relatively unexamined issues. For example, should the Moroccan infantry be represented by ESC counters (4-3) from the 1ere Marocaine Division counter set, or should the French ground troops be represented by French metropolitan INF (3-3) counters? If the former, does this make the game unbalanced in favor of the French side as some have suggested, or would the results possibly be closer to the reality of the actual historical situation. In our playthrough, my aggressive opponent played the Germans in his usual steadfast and opportunistic manner. The German Commander siezed the iniative at the start of the game and occupied advanced, town hex positions within Gembloux. This discumbobulated the initial French op plan and forced a series of right flank moves to try and get around the edge of the central German thrust. We played with the consolidation and the smoke rules and without the dreaded fog of war rule. Repeated French morale failures marred French attempts at comprehensive close assault sequencing.

In this play-through, the strength and weight of the Moroccan side's ESC infantry told the story as the game progressed. This scenario would definitely be improved in terms of play balance with modified victory conditions with a casualty limit on the French side.

This was a 4-session online match, that we ended on game turn 8, with a concession by the German Commander. At the time, the step losses were: 27 for Germans and 13 for the French, mostly reflecting dice rolling luck for the French in our first 2 online sessions. I doubt that the French side would have scored a victory if we had played the full 16-turn scenario, even with the ESC infantry units, given my penchant for bad morale and combat die rolls. In hindsight, it seems to me that a costly & frustrating French defeat was more or less inevitable with the published victory conditions. There is no way to play for a draw.

In short, I agree with my opponent's comments and the rating of a 2 for this one, although it probably deserves a 1 if played in face-to-face, online mode.

1 Comment
2022-01-12 16:16

Thanks for playing this scenario. As I stated in PG-HQ post available at :http://www.pg-hq.com/comms/showthread.php?tid=947&pid=11138&highlight=Leonard#pid11138 I really think the developer messed up with the victory conditions. Sorry for that and I hope (?) the original VC conditions to be better !

Philippe Leonard

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Drudgery!
Author Blackcloud6 (Germany)
Method VASSAL
Victor France
Participants treadasaurusrex (AAR)
Play Date 2021-12-29
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

Did anyone play test this scenario? The sheer weight of numbers on the Moroccan side with 16 tuns make this inevitable on the outcome. The only chance I saw in this as the Germans was to hopefully get the initiative and take town hexes on the first turn to gain the defense bonuses. I did so but it still did not matter. The scenario needed either different victory conditions or a casualty limit on the Moroccans. This simply turned into a slow drudgery of watching the Moroccans assault across the map. Gadz! I hate scenarios like this. But the reason why I gave it a 2 is that it might be, just might, be interesting to play solo.

Note: We played this with the red Moroccan counter thus giving the Moroccans the stronger ESC counters. This may make a difference in balance.

My complaint with this kind of scenario is there is not much for the defending player to do except take a turn-by-turn dice rolling beating. Not much fun.

3 Comments
2021-12-29 17:26

FWIW the Division Marocaine set has its own library entry for recording plays when using their upped stats. At least I think thats the distinction.

Comment from triangular_cube removed by author.
2022-01-12 16:19

Thanks for playing this scenario. As I stated in PG-HQ post available at :http://www.pg-hq.com/comms/showthread.php?tid=947&pid=11138&highlight=Leonard#pid11138 I really think the developer messed up with the victory conditions. Sorry for that and I hope (?) the original VC conditions to be better !

Philippe Leonard

2022-01-12 18:35

Thanks Philippe. Those VCs would change the scenario much, hopefully for the better.

You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
The victory conditions are wacked
Author richvalle (France)
Method Dual Table Setup + Email
Victor Germany
Participants unknown
Play Date 2015-01-26
Language English
Scenario FaoF021

While I enjoyed the battle itself there is no way for the French to win this one with the victory conditions as listed. Interestingly the scenario designer chimed in a post and said per his notes the conditions had been for the French to hold 3 more town hexes then they started with. I think this would have made for a better game.

The Germans did the obvious/smart thing and charged across the road and assaulted into the town hexes. I manged to do some damage as they charged across but once they got into the town they just sat there daring me to assault them with the -2 town bonus. As the French units and leaders are weaker this was going to be a losing proposition and the French refused to cooperate. Instead I just tried to inflict as much damage as I could while taking the least.

By the end of the game which ended in turn 15 because of a Catastrophe (darn cats) I had inflicted about 21 steps of losses and took 7. The French consider this a moral victory. :)

0 Comments
You must be a registered member and logged-in to post a comment.
Errors? Omissions? Report them!
Page generated in 1.357 seconds.