11-05-2015, 09:23 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2015, 05:08 PM by POUM.)
|
|
POUM
Recruit
|
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2015
|
|
FLM as ENG
4th ed. rules. 15.5 Flamethrowers: The FLM is treated as a non-engineer unit when entering minefields (16.63), and cannot clear minefields (16.65). FLM units are treated as a normal ENG unit in all other respects.
Those this mean that FLM units can assist in river crossings?
|
|
11-05-2015, 10:44 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2015, 10:45 PM by POUM.)
|
|
POUM
Recruit
|
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2015
|
|
RE: FLM as ENG
(11-05-2015, 10:20 PM)plloyd1010 Wrote: Yes, and fill in ditches, and clear mines.
4th ed. rules. 15.5 Flamethrowers: The FLM is treated as a non-engineer unit when entering minefields (16.63), and cannot clear minefields (16.65).
|
|
11-06-2015, 05:07 PM,
|
|
POUM
Recruit
|
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2015
|
|
RE: FLM as ENG
I use them as such until further notice ...
|
|
11-06-2015, 06:27 PM,
|
|
POUM
Recruit
|
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2015
|
|
RE: FLM as ENG
If you say so
|
|
11-06-2015, 06:42 PM,
|
|
POUM
Recruit
|
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: Nov 2015
|
|
RE: FLM as ENG
(11-06-2015, 06:36 PM)plloyd1010 Wrote: Simple question, do they function just like regular engineers or not?
That was my question. I don't now. You can read the rules like that. But in the AARs i'm reading of the game and scenario I'm playing, Cassino 44 scenario 3, they say one ENG. Conclusion out of that is that FLM is not a regular ENG.
|
|
11-06-2015, 07:23 PM,
|
|
plloyd1010
First Sergeant
|
Posts: 3,474
Threads: 353
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
RE: FLM as ENG
My point is that this is a pick your rule situation. You might consider address Avalanche support over on Consim. You might get an answer as to intent.
As for Cassino'44, it was written at a time when every game with FLM units had a slightly different special rule.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat!
|
|
|