Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
M8 Scott and Indirect Fire
07-18-2013, 10:18 AM,
#3
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire
(07-18-2013, 10:00 AM)campsawyer Wrote: Great question, I had heard this about M8's as well. I thought that they were more of SPA unit tank a tank for PG. I suppose one could change there factors, maybe 10-40 as BF instead of DF.

The real answer needs to come from Mike B. at APL.

The M8 was good in a DF role and used for bombardment. it was actually not good for an assault, since it was open topped and only had a rear facing .50cal for Air Defense as its secondary weapon.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by armyduck95 - 07-18-2013, 09:01 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by campsawyer - 07-18-2013, 10:00 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by armyduck95 - 07-18-2013, 10:18 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by campsawyer - 07-18-2013, 11:26 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by warstudent - 07-18-2013, 03:35 PM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by Shad - 07-19-2013, 08:38 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by warstudent - 07-18-2013, 03:51 PM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by plloyd1010 - 07-19-2013, 01:07 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by vince hughes - 07-19-2013, 02:16 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by plloyd1010 - 07-19-2013, 02:43 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by vince hughes - 07-19-2013, 08:35 PM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by campsawyer - 07-19-2013, 03:25 AM
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - by Matt W - 07-20-2013, 12:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)