Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Strange Bombardment 'Benefit'
09-18-2012, 02:56 AM,
#8
RE: A Strange Bombardment 'Benefit'
(09-18-2012, 02:18 AM)campsawyer Wrote: I was thinking about this a little more, should positive column shifts by an attacking or firing unit be mandatory or voluntary? In Vince's example, I could see for going the +1 for just trying to get a morale check on the enemy troops and preventing a kill on his own troops. If they have higher morale, they will probably be OK, while the lower morale enemy troops possibly disrupt or demoralize.

lol - You credit me with too much mercy !

In fact my guys were the lower moraled but dug-in. His were higher moraled but in a stack of 3 units for an extra +1. I was also risking friendly fire in adjacent hexes with a 1 or 2 roll.

This is the Alem Hamza SotM as desperate and furious Italian attempts to kick back the Indians continue. Tough, manic battle thats probably going to go the full 36 turns !
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A Strange Bombardment 'Benefit' - by vince hughes - 09-17-2012, 04:22 PM
RE: A Strange Bombardment 'Benefit' - by vince hughes - 09-18-2012, 02:56 AM
RE: A Strange Bombardment 'Benefit' - by Hugmenot - 09-18-2012, 07:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)