Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Airborne corps
12-07-2016, 02:39 AM,
#3
RE: Airborne corps
(12-05-2016, 11:43 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: This is basically a copy of jay Townsend's 2.36 Bazooka. The launcher is the same, the rocket is one revision lower. I do think that the AT value is a little low, but this is where one of those systemic considerations came in. I would advise using the ATR modifiers Mr. Rahman suggested for all dedicated infantry anti-tank units.

I agree: the AT value is too low but we have already discussed that point previously. My question was adressing the DIRECT fire value: your Baz counters indicate 2-2 Direct/Assault Fire value. Jay's counters were 0-0 and did not count against stacking.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Airborne corps - by leonard - 12-05-2016, 08:35 AM
RE: Airborne corps - by plloyd1010 - 12-05-2016, 11:43 AM
RE: Airborne corps - by leonard - 12-07-2016, 02:39 AM
RE: Airborne corps - by leonard - 12-07-2016, 03:39 AM
RE: Airborne corps - by plloyd1010 - 12-07-2016, 05:40 AM
RE: Airborne corps - by leonard - 12-17-2016, 10:50 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)