(10-02-2026, 12:00 PM)plloyd1010 Wrote: (10-02-2026, 11:07 AM)treadasaurusrex Wrote: True, except that C would be setting up a crossfire for B with its first shot at the KV-1.
Nope, because the rule says 2nd and/or subsequent shots. It does not say 2nd and/or subsequent shots reevaluate the crossfire status.
Oh, for Pete's sake!
Whoever wrote this inane rule must have never read any of the US tanker's reports about how to defeat Panthers and Tigers with under-armed Shermans in the Bulge. They uniformly mention the importance of getting shots at well-armored targets from all angles, at relatively close ranges, to make the AT hits count! Lose that second sentence in this poorly-conceived rule (11.12) so that multiple shots that meet the shot angle criteria get the +2 column shift bonus.
This is a simple fix of a very foolish and unrealistic rule.
