(04-07-2026, 11:47 PM)Grognard Gunny Wrote: Yeah, I read that too. My "problem" comes in with the paying of the MP cost in minor rivers. I WAS just trying to see if there was some agreed upon "magic number" that could be applied, and, hence, be standardized. Apparently, there is not, therefore i will "denote" a set of "fall back" numbers, and play them accordingly.
Thank you all for your input.
GG
Blackcloud is correct. Check the PG TEC for the movement cost for moving across minor rivers.
That's why there are no crossing numbers in that scenario instructions that you cite.
