PG-HQ Forums › PG Siblings › Infantry Attacks General Discussion v
IA vs PG: distinctly different games?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
IA vs PG: distinctly different games?
06-04-2025, 12:48 PM,
#16
plloyd1010 Offline
Sergeant Major
*****
 		Posts: 3,428
Threads: 348
Joined: Jun 2012
RE: IA vs PG: distinctly different games?
(06-04-2025, 12:35 PM)treadasaurusrex Wrote: Oh, and losing the crossfire rule from the 1st edition IA rules was never explained. It did make for much less close-range, urban assault, die rolling as others have hinted at.

I'm not so sure the crossfire rule would really be applicable in1914. It certainly would not be by 1917-18, but is quite viable for 1870-98, and probably for 1905 too.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
IA vs PG: distinctly different games? - by Tony M - 06-03-2025, 07:03 AM
RE: IA vs PG: distinctly different games? - by plloyd1010 - 06-04-2025, 12:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)