(02-25-2023, 08:40 AM)Grognard Gunny Wrote: It could be that you have me at a disadvantage! Since, except for my earliest one or two "games", I have used ed. 4 rules and charts as far as my little wars go. Having never had the advantage (????) of playing with both sets of rules, and wishing not to confuse the situation by "going back" to play the ed. 3 rules... I figure the fact that the scenarios just might be unbalanced.... might be moot.
Balance IS but a perception..... for you they might be unbalanced....For me, one side MUST try harder. .....and I never know the difference.
Perhaps, if and when an ed. 5 set of rules comes out, I'll be here talking about the "Good old rules" too. 
GG
I'm certainly not trying to pick on you
.
I've played 36 AK/Desert Rats scenarios in the last year, and even with 2nd/3rd edition terrain the VCs sometimes force the "attacker has no reason to attack" problem. Not having to get within 3 hexes for a general engagement makes the problem all that much worse and more prevalent though.
