10-23-2013, 05:03 AM
10-23-2013, 05:03 AM
10-23-2013, 06:12 AM
The question is how do you interpret this sentence:
Direct Fire may be traced through empty hexes, enemy-occupied hexes, or hexes containing only friendly AFVs.
I interpret "only friendly AFVs" as the the only friendly units in the hex are AFVs, regardless of the presence of enemy units.
So it's legal from my interpretation.
Direct Fire may be traced through empty hexes, enemy-occupied hexes, or hexes containing only friendly AFVs.
I interpret "only friendly AFVs" as the the only friendly units in the hex are AFVs, regardless of the presence of enemy units.
So it's legal from my interpretation.
10-23-2013, 07:03 AM
Ditto, fire away!
10-23-2013, 07:16 AM
perfectly legal. but I would worry more on the tank in the assault. one bad morale check could make it a bad day.
10-23-2013, 09:21 PM
Now it is crystal clear.
Matt W, Hugmenot, Campsayer, thanks
Matt W, Hugmenot, Campsayer, thanks
11-14-2013, 12:32 PM
(10-23-2013, 06:12 AM)Hugmenot Wrote: [ -> ]The question is how do you interpret this sentence:
Direct Fire may be traced through empty hexes, enemy-occupied hexes, or hexes containing only friendly AFVs.
I interpret "only friendly AFVs" as the the only friendly units in the hex are AFVs, regardless of the presence of enemy units.
So it's legal from my interpretation.
I agree. The intent of the rule is on the friendlies only being AFVs, not on there only being friendly AFVs in the hex (no enemy).