04-16-2013, 12:00 PM
Pages: 1 2
04-16-2013, 07:11 PM
I appreciate the sentiment, but I actually voted against myself.
We may be pretty awesome within the limited realm that is board games, but I aim higher.
We may be pretty awesome within the limited realm that is board games, but I aim higher.
04-17-2013, 01:49 AM
Shad, don't vote against yourself! If there is a web-site, I would like to see it!
04-17-2013, 03:19 AM
I have voted yes but I am hoping for some sort of mention in Shads's annual presentation.
04-17-2013, 09:26 AM
(04-17-2013, 01:49 AM)JayTownsend Wrote: [ -> ]Shad, don't vote against yourself! If there is a web-site, I would like to see it!
At the risk of demoralizing all of my fans, here is my personal wish-list for PG-HQ:
- photo gallery support both as general uploads and in AARs
- campaign manager tools to handle the bookkeeping of all the various PG campaigns
- support for user-defined campaigns
- regular tournaments and an all-time ladder
- an exhaustive library of player aids
- more search options
- about 10x more statistics, better presentation thereof (charts), and achievements
- usability enhancements throughout the site (mostly as javascript)
- a comprehensive guide for people completely new to PG that walks them through each aspect of the rules
- 5000 members, not 500
- support from the Publisher!!!
If I could clap my hands and all of those milestones were suddenly met... well, I'd probably start playing more PG!
04-17-2013, 10:03 AM
Leave the site as is Andrew and start playing more PG!
04-17-2013, 02:17 PM
(04-17-2013, 10:03 AM)JayTownsend Wrote: [ -> ]Leave the site as is Andrew and start playing more PG!
No!! Infantry Attacks first!!
Then numbers of counter types in each game, then . . .
Seriously, Andrew, hope you get to play some, too.
04-17-2013, 03:17 PM
Ah yes, forgot about per-game counter inventories!
04-17-2013, 05:29 PM
Or my Saipan Ribbon!
04-23-2013, 05:03 AM
The only reason I've gotten into PG is because of this site.
Pages: 1 2