(03-03-2013, 08:02 AM)campsawyer Wrote: [ -> ]Shad, there maybe momentum on this beyond what I had discussed with you at the turn of the year.
I'm all ears.
(03-03-2013, 09:41 AM)rerathbun Wrote: [ -> ]If IA was added to PG-HQ or a sister site, I bet it would get a lot more plays from a lot more people (hint, hint).
Talk to Sawyer!
Don't forget the Mouse That Roared!
(03-03-2013, 09:41 AM)rerathbun Wrote: [ -> ]I'd be more likely to play IA if I could record the plays as they happen. If IA was added to PG-HQ or a sister site, I bet it would get a lot more plays from a lot more people (hint, hint).
Same here.
Ditto (a well worn phrase to be sure).
I have talked with Shad about this and he believes something can be done to create a sub-site of PG-HQ. We will probably start with just the recording of AAR's to get more interest going, then push on from there. It will take a bit of time to get it all together, so be a little patient.
So what do we have? Mouse, August and that Mexican thing that I can't spell?
Currently I.A. is out of print. But there are two new boxed releases approaching release. The big question is die-cutting or laser cutting.
Matt, we are far, far from needing alternate history scenarios for infantry attacks but........
The war of Mexican American war is taught far differently in Mexico than in the U.S. There was plenty of sentiment for a war to redeem the lost territories at that time (today its called the Azatlan movement). Had Mexico not been caught up in civil war, had the Zimmerman telegram not been decoded, the Western front of WWI could have had a totally different meaning today.
Before launching into possible fantasyland I was thinking more along the lines of the Askaris but am not sure if the rules system will work. I need to start setting up and playing a few.