11-08-2012, 04:44 AM
11-08-2012, 06:12 AM
Why? The OT-130 replaced the OT-26 in 1933, though I have no idea what the active service life was of either model. I do know that the OT-130 used a larger turret than the OT-26.
11-08-2012, 06:33 AM
3 reasons:
1. The scenario book calls for OP-26's.
2. The OOBs I've seen many references to the OT-26, few OT-130's. There do not seem to have been very many present for these battles.
3. Flamethrower tanks should have red DF values.
P.S. The OT-26 and HT-26 are synonymous.
1. The scenario book calls for OP-26's.
2. The OOBs I've seen many references to the OT-26, few OT-130's. There do not seem to have been very many present for these battles.
3. Flamethrower tanks should have red DF values.
P.S. The OT-26 and HT-26 are synonymous.
11-08-2012, 06:57 AM
Most likely too late now as the Power of the East was a download supplement but this information on the AP.
11-08-2012, 11:37 PM
As Jay tried to type, pass the info on. PG Nomahan, the boxed game, is still on the boxed burner, and it why PotE isn't a candidate for laser treatment.