1) In the case of open-topped AFV, I have always thought that allowing them the same immunity as tanks a bit much. So I have HR'ed a minus 2 on the DF and BF charts to give them SOME vulerability.
2) In the case of retreating, I have decided that as long as there is a good order unit in the same hex, the unit does not have to retreat.(That makes sense!)
Any thoughts on those?
GG
The AFVs are affected by Xs only in direct & bombardment fire.
The open-topped ones have to take an M2, the closed-top (turreted tanks) take a regular M check.
Got it, but..... "house rules" are supposed to be alternate rules.... supposedly to make the game "better". (....and virtually everyone has at least one!)
GG
(03-17-2024, 07:46 AM)ACav Wrote: [ -> ]The AFVs are affected by Xs only in direct & bombardment fire.
The open-topped ones have to take an M2, the closed-top (turreted tanks) take a regular M check.
Additionally, if there is an 2X or 3X result, the 2nd X is taken from an open-topped AFV, if present.
(03-17-2024, 06:30 PM)plloyd1010 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2024, 07:46 AM)ACav Wrote: [ -> ]The AFVs are affected by Xs only in direct & bombardment fire.
The open-topped ones have to take an M2, the closed-top (turreted tanks) take a regular M check.
Additionally, if there is an 2X or 3X result, the 2nd X is taken from an open-topped AFV, if present.
And if they are alone the 1st X is still hitting the open topped AFV. It seems by house ruling to make the open top more vulnerable to MX checks you are actually making them less vulnerable to DF/BF by strongly reducing the chances of causing a step loss.