At the bottom of the PG-HQ's Most Wanted section, there are 2 lists, Top 10 least played Games & Top 10 least AARd Games. Both of thse lists include modules with a scenario count of 0, which will obviously never be played. Can we set these lists to only pull in modules with a scenario count of at least 1? Otherwise, eventually, these lists will just be lists of modules with 0 scenarios.
Those should be going away soon.
Thanks for your vigilance, tread!
In the meantime, please click the big three digit number on the front page or go directly here:
http://www.pg-hq.com/library.php?type=ca...s-unplayed
that will show you the rarest unplayed scenarios that you own, if you want to help us reduce the number of 0 play scenarios (please please please!)
(01-20-2023, 06:28 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: [ -> ]Those should be going away soon.
What is? The lists? The page? The modules?
the modules with zero scenarios
(01-20-2023, 12:05 PM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ]the modules with zero scenarios
Do we have a plan to make a second area for them? Maybe alongside those division sets that were released or something? I do like that the product is in our DB somewhere.
We don't have a plan, but it's under discussion. They don't belong in Games because games have scenarios.
I'm willing to hear suggestions on a logical place for them to be within the Library. That can/may involve making a new type of Library item.
(01-21-2023, 06:58 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ]We don't have a plan, but it's under discussion. They don't belong in Games because games have scenarios.
I'm willing to hear suggestions on a logical place for them to be within the Library. That can/may involve making a new type of Library item.
Well my skills as an auditor lend themselves far better to finding and reporting small errors on the site rather than coming up with solutions
.
My suggestion would be for a new library item type, "enhancements", for all the officially sold products that are not "games"; including IDF, East Front Artillery, the special division sets, that fields and hills 3d overlay thingy (if that had ever materialized), and anything else APL ends up putting out. I did draw the arbitrary line in my proposal at "sold", so we arent creating entries for every little supplemental download they have put out.
While I do agree that IDF & EFA aren't "games", and kinda mess up some stats (as started this thread), it seems a bit odd to exclude any mention of these official and current products from the site. Just my 2 cents.
I'll go back to spamming Peter with OOB corrections in the background now
(01-21-2023, 02:31 PM)triangular_cube Wrote: [ -> ]Well my skills as an auditor lend themselves far better to finding and reporting small errors on the site rather than coming up with solutions .
So it would seem.
(01-21-2023, 02:31 PM)triangular_cube Wrote: [ -> ]I'll go back to spamming Peter with OOB corrections in the background now
.... and you're back it.
Drew is doing some other maintenance too. I should be able to get back to formations soon. All the little details that make this site great.