08-25-2012, 09:24 AM
(08-25-2012, 09:04 AM)J6A Wrote: [ -> ]are you talking the average rating of all the scenarios played?
Average rating of all votes for all scenarios played. Slightly different result than averaging the averages.
(08-25-2012, 09:04 AM)J6A Wrote: [ -> ]are you talking the average rating of all the scenarios played?
(08-25-2012, 08:47 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ]Is is the best PG game ever? I doubt it. Newness and relief of finally owning it certainly have an impact. It'll be really interesting to see how it does long term.
(08-25-2012, 08:47 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ]For what it's worth, Kursk is 2 ratings short of making the 30 vote minimum and assuming no great change between now and then it will take the top rated game spot by a mile. Here's the expected Top 5:
Code:3.89 - Kursk (28 ratings)
3.7 - Cassino '44
3.52 - Elsenborn Ridge
3.42 - Fall of France
3.41 - Road to Berlin
Is is the best PG game ever? I doubt it. Newness and relief of finally owning it certainly have an impact. It'll be really interesting to see how it does long term.
(08-25-2012, 10:33 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: [ -> ]I suppose one might improve the analysis (were one so inclined) by normalizing each game rating by a given player to that player's "global" average. Of course, this would mean that any game/scenario's rating would be fluid as members continue to log plays (and their average changes) and would incorporate any "drift", that is, whether a given member grades more easily or harshly as more plays are logged (which would be an interesting study in and of itself).
(08-25-2012, 10:48 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ]If you want to try to put together a more meaningful algorithm than just a straight average, I can give you a data dump of scenario, rating, and userIDs to play with in Excel.
Quote:Fluidity of ratings is meaningless to PG-HQ. ... Anything in the queue gets a full rating recalc.
(08-25-2012, 11:24 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: [ -> ]Heh ... the assign-the-suggester-as-Chair-of-the-Task-Force ploy!
(08-25-2012, 11:44 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ](08-25-2012, 11:24 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: [ -> ]Heh ... the assign-the-suggester-as-Chair-of-the-Task-Force ploy!
I am wonderfully, fantastically good at this! Ask Alan (Annotated Rules), Peter (Formations), Robin (most scenario data), Randy (many of our tour of duty ribbons)... the list goes on!
(08-25-2012, 12:12 PM)campsawyer Wrote: [ -> ](08-25-2012, 11:44 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ](08-25-2012, 11:24 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: [ -> ]Heh ... the assign-the-suggester-as-Chair-of-the-Task-Force ploy!
I am wonderfully, fantastically good at this! Ask Alan (Annotated Rules), Peter (Formations), Robin (most scenario data), Randy (many of our tour of duty ribbons)... the list goes on!
Time to put the pin in the ego
(08-25-2012, 11:44 AM)Shad Wrote: [ -> ](08-25-2012, 11:24 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: [ -> ]Heh ... the assign-the-suggester-as-Chair-of-the-Task-Force ploy!
I am wonderfully, fantastically good at this! Ask Alan (Annotated Rules), Peter (Formations), Robin (most scenario data), Randy (many of our tour of duty ribbons)... the list goes on!