PG-HQ Forums

Full Version: Censored again
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2


Managed to have a post trimmed again over as CSW. I didn't disclose any GCI info, just tried to help a poster with question. Mentioned John Stafford's social network link, where he mentioned that Sword of David would cover the 1967 war. I don't blame Mike here, because 1. he like to make all the announcements, which are often subject to change, and 2. I may well have been exposing John's privacy, and 3. maybe he doesn't want development info posted on social networks, like the earlier Twitter at Avalanche, which posted the development status of many projects. Some that had been listed as finished there have gone into re-development since then, so that decision makes some sense.

Anyway, glad we have an off-base meeting place for this military clubRolleyes
So Larry, you got caught giving away State secrets once again, huh??? Smile

(07-27-2012, 12:52 AM)larry marak Wrote: [ -> ]

Managed to have a post trimmed again over as CSW. I didn't disclose any GCI info, just tried to help a poster with question. Mentioned John Stafford's social network link, where he mentioned that Sword of David would cover the 1967 war. I don't blame Mike here, because 1. he like to make all the announcements, which are often subject to change, and 2. I may well have been exposing John's privacy, and 3. maybe he doesn't want development info posted on social networks, like the earlier Twitter at Avalanche, which posted the development status of many projects. Some that had been listed as finished there have gone into re-development since then, so that decision makes some sense.

Anyway, glad we have an off-base meeting place for this military clubRolleyes
It wasn't even an official state secret, at least that Sword of David focuses on the 1967 battles. That info wasn't edited out, just where to find John Stafford's social-network posting.

Now in my bad old days I used to drive Richard Berg crazy. Not once, but 3 times! He actually got banned from CSW for two weeks for one of his reactions! I'm just a bubblingly enthusiastic player of PG, GWAS and SWWAS.Angel
Larry, are you starting to see a pattern.Idea
I tell you what Larry.

I wouldn't want you in my platoon if the enemy sent over a prisoner-grab party and they captured you. I'm pretty sure our positions would be mortared with pin-point accuracy by the next morning !!

Also, you might find MB returning your $35 GC membership if you continue to 'grass'. Remember where you heard that one first (as well as CSW) :-) lol
(07-27-2012, 02:35 AM)larry marak Wrote: [ -> ]Now in my bad old days I used to drive Richard Berg crazy. Not once, but 3 times! He actually got banned from CSW for two weeks for one of his reactions!
I am glad you did. He certainly deserved it for putting so many underdeveloped games on the market.
Gee, Vince, I know Mike keeps a taser handy, do you Yardies carry them too?
(07-27-2012, 06:05 AM)larry marak Wrote: [ -> ]Gee, Vince, I know Mike keeps a taser handy, do you Yardies carry them too?

Yes we do,

But I'd never use it on somebody posting !

I only use it in the last 2 turns of a PG FTF scenario that looks as if I might be about to lose !
I'll consider my self fairly warned.
Getting nailed for posting a link to someone else's indiscretion sounds like bullshit to me. He should be directing his dissatisfaction towards Stafford.
Pages: 1 2