PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › General Discussion v
Burning Tigers ATR question.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Burning Tigers ATR question.
07-10-2014, 03:09 AM,
#1
larry marak Offline
Recruit
*****
 		Posts: 1,343
Threads: 194
Joined: May 2012
Burning Tigers ATR question.
Burning Tigers features both Soviet Army and Guards units. both have atr platoons. I understand how a better equipted Guards unit could pack more punch, but why do they have a longer range for their rifles than their countrymen?
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 04:05 AM,
#2
Matt W Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
*****
 		Posts: 1,037
Threads: 22
Joined: Jun 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
Better training.
No "minor" country left behind...
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 04:54 AM,
#3
campsawyer Offline
First Lieutenant
*****
 		Posts: 1,023
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
Larry,

They have been asking that question for years. Wink

So what are the differences in the values? Are you talking now an ATR has the range of 75mm gun or is it just one more hex. If it just one hex, then it could be better training or APL just messing with our minds or misprint. Take your pick.
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 05:38 AM,
#4
larry marak Offline
Recruit
*****
 		Posts: 1,343
Threads: 194
Joined: May 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
The range of the rifles is 3 for the Guard riflemen, but only 2 for the army riflemen. 1-3 versus 1-2. Since these weapons were only truely effective in same hex combat, the extra hex range doesn't make a difference. This dicotomy shows up in KSF as well. Just wondered if the Guards had a longer gun barrel, or better charge in their bullets.
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 06:24 AM,
#5
Hugmenot Offline
First Lieutenant
*****
 		Posts: 1,393
Threads: 51
Joined: May 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
My Tigers are trembling with fear.
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 06:26 AM,
#6
larrymm Offline
Recruit
**
 		Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
Am I correct in thinking that ATRs can be used to set up AT crossfire? If this is correct, than the extra hex of range for Guards units does have a real, if very modest, effect.
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 06:34 AM,
#7
richvalle Offline
Corporal
****
 		Posts: 527
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2013
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
(07-10-2014, 06:26 AM)larrymm Wrote: Am I correct in thinking that ATRs can be used to set up AT crossfire? If this is correct, than the extra hex of range for Guards units does have a real, if very modest, effect.

They can. Though they can't fire at x2 the range.

rv
Find
Reply
07-10-2014, 07:09 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-10-2014, 08:12 AM by larry marak.)
#8
larry marak Offline
Recruit
*****
 		Posts: 1,343
Threads: 194
Joined: May 2012
RE: Burning Tigers ATR question.
And there is a rules option, by Jason Rahman published as Daily Content that suggests that atrs defending in an assault hex against armor can be assumed to be in crossfire and should received a considerable on the spot increase to their anti-tank value in that situation. http://www.avalanchepress.com/Rifles.php Would have liked for this to have ended up in the 4th edition rule options.

Can't ask M Perryman what his reasoning was, he designed PG Citadel many years ago and his reasons are lost (if the difference wasn't added during development by Doug McNair, who is out of the loop now).
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)