Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Logistic shortfall shit
11-28-2015, 09:28 AM,
#3
RE: Logistic shortfall shit
I would agree with Larry. If either side is preparing for a long battle, whether on the attack or defense, I would think they would both be amply supplied. Defenders preparing for the coming assault would be bringing in every box of ammo they could get their hands on. The attackers would in turn ensure that every man had extra magazines, and that the artillery batteries were well stocked for the preparatory bombardment as well as follow on FFE.
I think the logistics shortfall should be used in scenarios based on hasty assaults or breakthrough/exploitation assaults when the forces outrun their supply chain (think Patton's 3rd Army), or in scenarios where a unit is conducting a rear guard action, forlorn hope situation, or extremely long sieges, as Larry suggested.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Logistic shortfall shit - by leonard - 11-28-2015, 02:54 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by larry marak - 11-28-2015, 05:27 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by Coniglius - 11-28-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by vince hughes - 11-28-2015, 09:56 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by Matt W - 11-28-2015, 11:33 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by leonard - 11-30-2015, 03:00 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by richvalle - 11-29-2015, 10:30 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by Schoenwulf - 12-20-2015, 02:30 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by larry marak - 12-20-2015, 05:07 AM
RE: Logistic shortfall shit - by J6A - 12-20-2015, 10:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)