LOS on slopes

[Blackcloud6]

Blackcloud, I'm confused....
The rule (as Peter reviewed it in this case) says they DO have LOS...and there is NO reverse slope option here....

You seem to be saying that they DO NOT have LOS----that Reverse slope protection/cover is available---and that is NOT what
  was assessed by Peter (correctly according to RAW).....

Am I missing something? (again)?

 
No, you are not missing something, for some reason I read the rule backwards. (and I'm humble enough to admit when I make a mistake, Treaddino will like that statement, lol)  I read it from the online rules and the print is small and I'm getting old and that is my excuse.  But my general argument is the same, there is nothing wrong with the rule, I'll just reverse my argument.  The designer intended to allow you to fire from crests and in order to do reverse slope defense you need to establish the crest line and move back from it until you are not seen.

Here is my overall crux of the macro-problem, it seems to me, too many players are fighting the rule and trying to force them to play the way they want them too.  Frankly, I think this is a huge problem here on PG-HQ, especially with some members who appear to push their desired rule changes and house rules.    Here is the bottom line, if you want to have a game series that is going to have extensive FtF and online play, the rules have to be standard.