Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did anyone notice AVF's in assault?
07-29-2022, 04:43 AM,
#4
RE: Did anyone notice AVF's in assault?
(07-29-2022, 03:31 AM)triangular_cube Wrote: In third, it was one of the many semi core rules that were included in most modules' special rule section. When it wasn't included in others it was left up to the user to determine if it was intended or an oversight, or what... I don't know to what level it is documented in 4th edition. Many of these game distinctions did not exist in the 2nd edition modules, although original BotB had a different Open Topped rule that made them sturdier than the current one.

I started wondering this morning if it was a standardized GSR. Every boxed game up through RdDk makes note of tank destroyers, if they are in the game. There is nothing in the standard rules, going back to the 2nd edition, that says anything about them in regard to function or difference.

Road to Dunkirk had this:
Armored cars, self-propelled artillery (5.64), open-top AFVS, APCS, Tank Destroyers and Armored Transports do not provide a bonus for assault combat. Only efficient tanks (vehicles that have armor values and do not fall into any of the previous categories) provide the +1 column adjustment for infantry-armor combined arms on the assault table. Note that only German tanks are efficient in Road to Dunkirk.
cjsiam likes this post
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Did anyone notice AVF's in assault? - by plloyd1010 - 07-29-2022, 04:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)